مطلع حق بیمه برای مخفی کردن تمام تبلیغات
پست ها: 46   بازدید شده توسط: 84 users

پست اصلی

ارسال شده توسط x___, 30.11.2013 - 19:00
Everyone knows one of the most played scenarios nowadays is GGG. It's loved by many and is a precious diamond of the atwar game. It probably fills up in less than 3 minutes maximum. Well, its unfortunate for all of us as since it has been deleted. By whom? Tik-Tok. There was an unfortunate course of events where Tik-Tok was made an editor by Tunder3(the dazzling creator of this gem). An unforeseen trail of events unfolded as Tik-Tok unleashed his deleting rage. We must as a community question Tik-Tok's decisions and demand an answer for his actions. Let there be mercy and enough determination in Tunder3 for him to put in countless hours again to benefit the atwar community.
01.12.2013 - 15:43
نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:26

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 15:15

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:11

نوشتع شده توسط Utah, 30.11.2013 at 19:53

نوشتع شده توسط SQUARED, 30.11.2013 at 19:35

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 30.11.2013 at 19:19

If even. I don't think maps should be deletable at all.
If I publish a book, I can edit it later, but I can't go "oh no, I screwed up, can everyone just give their copies back plz?"
AW maps should work the same way in my opinion.

I agree, it should not be possible to "unpublish" a map. It is unnecessary and gives too much power to map-makers.


So if I have a great update that is game-breaking while I am working on it I can't unpublish the map because you is scurred?


Leave the old version up till the new one is ready, then switch. Geez.


Old == New, you can't have the same map up whilst it's unpublished.


You can't edit a map without having to unpublish it? -.-


No. It's called fucking maintenance. Wanna play on a half-built map, then complain that it's half-finished on the forums because you're a dumb-as-shit Plebian who cannot comprehend the simple-as-shit concept that we edit our maps to make them better, and have to save very often because the editor tends to kick us off?

Tl;Dr: We unpublish because we save often, even when the map is technically broken, because we get kicked a lot.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 15:53
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 15:43

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:26

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 15:15

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:11

نوشتع شده توسط Utah, 30.11.2013 at 19:53

نوشتع شده توسط SQUARED, 30.11.2013 at 19:35

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 30.11.2013 at 19:19

If even. I don't think maps should be deletable at all.
If I publish a book, I can edit it later, but I can't go "oh no, I screwed up, can everyone just give their copies back plz?"
AW maps should work the same way in my opinion.

I agree, it should not be possible to "unpublish" a map. It is unnecessary and gives too much power to map-makers.


So if I have a great update that is game-breaking while I am working on it I can't unpublish the map because you is scurred?


Leave the old version up till the new one is ready, then switch. Geez.


Old == New, you can't have the same map up whilst it's unpublished.


You can't edit a map without having to unpublish it? -.-


No. It's called fucking maintenance. Wanna play on a half-built map, then complain that it's half-finished on the forums because you're a dumb-as-shit Plebian who cannot comprehend the simple-as-shit concept that we edit our maps to make them better, and have to save very often because the editor tends to kick us off?

Tl;Dr: We unpublish because we save often, even when the map is technically broken, because we get kicked a lot.


I love how this gets said by a dude that has made 1 map with 5 plays on it.

Plus, if you're only going to build half the map at a time, don't bother. -.-
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 16:13
نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:53

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 15:43

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:26

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 15:15

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:11

نوشتع شده توسط Utah, 30.11.2013 at 19:53

نوشتع شده توسط SQUARED, 30.11.2013 at 19:35

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 30.11.2013 at 19:19

If even. I don't think maps should be deletable at all.
If I publish a book, I can edit it later, but I can't go "oh no, I screwed up, can everyone just give their copies back plz?"
AW maps should work the same way in my opinion.

I agree, it should not be possible to "unpublish" a map. It is unnecessary and gives too much power to map-makers.


So if I have a great update that is game-breaking while I am working on it I can't unpublish the map because you is scurred?


Leave the old version up till the new one is ready, then switch. Geez.


Old == New, you can't have the same map up whilst it's unpublished.


You can't edit a map without having to unpublish it? -.-


No. It's called fucking maintenance. Wanna play on a half-built map, then complain that it's half-finished on the forums because you're a dumb-as-shit Plebian who cannot comprehend the simple-as-shit concept that we edit our maps to make them better, and have to save very often because the editor tends to kick us off?

Tl;Dr: We unpublish because we save often, even when the map is technically broken, because we get kicked a lot.


I love how this gets said by a dude that has made 1 map with 5 plays on it.

Plus, if you're only going to build half the map at a time, don't bother. -.-


You have no knowledge of my existence or expertise, or else you would have shut your talkhole by now. I am NOT being literal by saying "half" you unsophisticated serf, I am stating that a Cartographer may not both have a map published, and edit it, if it means the map must be saved whilst editing it to avoid server kicks. If it were not saved, there is the possibility to lose all of your work, and if it is saved while working, the map may become unbalanced, due to not being finished. If I were to keep a map published whilst editing it and save it, you people would come bitching and moaning on the forums that it's broken.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 16:13
 Nero
نوشتع شده توسط Utah, 01.12.2013 at 15:34





mfw
----
Laochra¹: i pray to the great zizou, that my tb stops the airtrans of the yellow infidel
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 16:27
 Utah
نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:53

*Insert idiocracy here*


Stop it, you are embarrassing yourself.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 17:31
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 16:13

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:53

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 15:43

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:26

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 15:15

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:11

نوشتع شده توسط Utah, 30.11.2013 at 19:53

نوشتع شده توسط SQUARED, 30.11.2013 at 19:35

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 30.11.2013 at 19:19

If even. I don't think maps should be deletable at all.
If I publish a book, I can edit it later, but I can't go "oh no, I screwed up, can everyone just give their copies back plz?"
AW maps should work the same way in my opinion.

I agree, it should not be possible to "unpublish" a map. It is unnecessary and gives too much power to map-makers.


So if I have a great update that is game-breaking while I am working on it I can't unpublish the map because you is scurred?


Leave the old version up till the new one is ready, then switch. Geez.


Old == New, you can't have the same map up whilst it's unpublished.


You can't edit a map without having to unpublish it? -.-


No. It's called fucking maintenance. Wanna play on a half-built map, then complain that it's half-finished on the forums because you're a dumb-as-shit Plebian who cannot comprehend the simple-as-shit concept that we edit our maps to make them better, and have to save very often because the editor tends to kick us off?

Tl;Dr: We unpublish because we save often, even when the map is technically broken, because we get kicked a lot.


I love how this gets said by a dude that has made 1 map with 5 plays on it.

Plus, if you're only going to build half the map at a time, don't bother. -.-


You have no knowledge of my existence or expertise, or else you would have shut your talkhole by now. I am NOT being literal by saying "half" you unsophisticated serf, I am stating that a Cartographer may not both have a map published, and edit it, if it means the map must be saved whilst editing it to avoid server kicks. If it were not saved, there is the possibility to lose all of your work, and if it is saved while working, the map may become unbalanced, due to not being finished. If I were to keep a map published whilst editing it and save it, you people would come bitching and moaning on the forums that it's broken.


Lawl. Sorry, but I don't think I should concern myself with every single lowly rank 6 out there who wants attention. And please, do stop calling yourself a "Cartographer". I repeat, 1 map with 5 plays on it. xD

As for your argument, perhaps you should have mentioned that *before* starting to throw out insults willy-nilly.
Not everyone makes maps you know. -.-
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 17:42
نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 17:31

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 16:13

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:53

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 15:43

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:26

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 15:15

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 01.12.2013 at 15:11

نوشتع شده توسط Utah, 30.11.2013 at 19:53

نوشتع شده توسط SQUARED, 30.11.2013 at 19:35

نوشتع شده توسط durfnv8, 30.11.2013 at 19:19

If even. I don't think maps should be deletable at all.
If I publish a book, I can edit it later, but I can't go "oh no, I screwed up, can everyone just give their copies back plz?"
AW maps should work the same way in my opinion.

I agree, it should not be possible to "unpublish" a map. It is unnecessary and gives too much power to map-makers.


So if I have a great update that is game-breaking while I am working on it I can't unpublish the map because you is scurred?


Leave the old version up till the new one is ready, then switch. Geez.


Old == New, you can't have the same map up whilst it's unpublished.


You can't edit a map without having to unpublish it? -.-


No. It's called fucking maintenance. Wanna play on a half-built map, then complain that it's half-finished on the forums because you're a dumb-as-shit Plebian who cannot comprehend the simple-as-shit concept that we edit our maps to make them better, and have to save very often because the editor tends to kick us off?

Tl;Dr: We unpublish because we save often, even when the map is technically broken, because we get kicked a lot.


I love how this gets said by a dude that has made 1 map with 5 plays on it.

Plus, if you're only going to build half the map at a time, don't bother. -.-


You have no knowledge of my existence or expertise, or else you would have shut your talkhole by now. I am NOT being literal by saying "half" you unsophisticated serf, I am stating that a Cartographer may not both have a map published, and edit it, if it means the map must be saved whilst editing it to avoid server kicks. If it were not saved, there is the possibility to lose all of your work, and if it is saved while working, the map may become unbalanced, due to not being finished. If I were to keep a map published whilst editing it and save it, you people would come bitching and moaning on the forums that it's broken.


Lawl. Sorry, but I don't think I should concern myself with every single lowly rank 6 out there who wants attention. And please, do stop calling yourself a "Cartographer". I repeat, 1 map with 5 plays on it. xD

As for your argument, perhaps you should have mentioned that *before* starting to throw out insults willy-nilly.
Not everyone makes maps you know. -.-


Go educate yourself, I'm much more than a 1-map rank 6.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 17:54
 Utah
Gardevoir is a skilled mapmaker. Also scenarios aren't shown on your profile.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 18:08
Senarrio makers are the real sprit of atwar ;^)
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 18:25
نوشتع شده توسط Utah, 01.12.2013 at 17:54

Gardevoir is a skilled mapmaker. Also scenarios aren't shown on your profile.

Gardevoir is skilled in everything, he has played the game since beta with me and a few other inactives. He made some of the finest scernarios when that came out.
----
نوشتع شده توسط NateBaller, 30.08.2012 at 20:04

I make Americans look bad? Are you kidding me?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 18:28
Durfnv8, you are a true asshole so shut up you havent even played the game that long, you dont support it money wise, and you are accusing someone of something when you dont even know him or his history!
----
نوشتع شده توسط NateBaller, 30.08.2012 at 20:04

I make Americans look bad? Are you kidding me?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 19:05
 Utah
Guys guys guys, SQUARED and Durfunkel-whatever are obviously working together to troll us. Just stop replying.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 19:19
نوشتع شده توسط SQUARED, 01.12.2013 at 18:42

نوشتع شده توسط DURRHUNTER, 01.12.2013 at 18:28

Durfnv8, you are a true asshole so shut up you havent even played the game that long, you dont support it money wise, and you are accusing someone of something when you dont even know him or his history!

Why does it matter how long he has played the game for? Joining in 2011 doesn't mean your opinion is more valid.


Actually, I joined in 2010. This is my (formerly) alt. account, though my main has been deleted by myself for some time, and yes, it does make an opinion more valid, Seniority rules.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
01.12.2013 - 20:29
 x___
نوشتع شده توسط Utah, 01.12.2013 at 14:13

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 11:49

A little birdie told me that Tik-Tok had nothing to do with any of this, and Tunder simply unpublished his map for the lulz.


It seems sort of fishy to me too. There are two sides to every story.


Heil King Tunder
----
не смотри где я - лучше смотри где ты
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
02.12.2013 - 05:45
 Utah
نوشتع شده توسط x___, 01.12.2013 at 20:29

نوشتع شده توسط Utah, 01.12.2013 at 14:13

نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 01.12.2013 at 11:49

A little birdie told me that Tik-Tok had nothing to do with any of this, and Tunder simply unpublished his map for the lulz.


It seems sort of fishy to me too. There are two sides to every story.


Heil King Tunder


You put him above your Great Utah?
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
02.12.2013 - 06:26
Getting off topic; locked.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
  • 1
  • 2
atWar

About Us
Contact

حریم خصوصی | شرایط و قوانین | بنرها | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

به ما بپیوندید در

گسترش این کلمه