مطلع حق بیمه برای مخفی کردن تمام تبلیغات
پست ها: 13   بازدید شده توسط: 112 users
05.04.2012 - 15:24
They always fail, noobs quits making it unfair and boring.
----
I dont understand why people says that Full Package is too expensive:
http://imageshack.us/a/img854/6531/fzhd.png

"I... Feel a little dead inside"
-Gardevoir
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.04.2012 - 15:26
True that.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.04.2012 - 15:51
 YOBA
That could be said for every scenario. Even Andartes' World War I fails because some noob always has to quit. And that only requires 10 players, whereas the average all-encompassing WWII scenario includes upwards of 12 players.
----
YOBA:
Youth-Oriented, Bydło-Approved
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.04.2012 - 15:58
True WWII works well in casual games
----
~My plump juicy breasts are none of your god damn business~
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.04.2012 - 16:01
Yes..
maybe because ppl have more time there and dont have to leave?
The problem with balanced scenarios is that you need all the people for it to be balanced.
For true WWII it's 18 people and always someone has to leave early.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.04.2012 - 18:05
Well just stop playing them. Problem solved.
----
I like stuff.... Yay?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.04.2012 - 18:38
Looks like i'll have to make 1914: Dawn of war noob-proof now
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.04.2012 - 18:58
 YOBA
BTW, just because only one WWII scenario is really popular that just happens to go by the name of "True World War II" (to reflect the focus on historical accuracy) doesn't make all of them like it. Change the title. Barbarossa 6 player is quite good by the way, though it only simulates one theatre of the conflict.
----
YOBA:
Youth-Oriented, Bydło-Approved
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.04.2012 - 20:20
نوشتع شده توسط YOBA, 05.04.2012 at 18:58

Barbarossa 6 player is quite good by the way, though it only simulates one theatre of the conflict.


This^
----
I like stuff.... Yay?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
06.04.2012 - 06:54
Eh Barbarossa 6 player is terrible also.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
06.04.2012 - 08:37
 YOBA
نوشتع شده توسط nonames, 06.04.2012 at 06:54
Eh Barbarossa 6 player is terrible also.

You can't really talk because you don't play scenarios anyway.

It's not as good as his World War I. Not even close. Now that's a really good scenario.
----
YOBA:
Youth-Oriented, Bydło-Approved
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
06.04.2012 - 09:14
نوشتع شده توسط YOBA, 06.04.2012 at 08:37

نوشتع شده توسط nonames, 06.04.2012 at 06:54
Eh Barbarossa 6 player is terrible also.

You can't really talk because you don't play scenarios anyway.

It's not as good as his World War I. Not even close. Now that's a really good scenario.


i have played all those scenarios, i don't enjoy them, alot of the skill in afterwind is sensible expansion, scenarios remove this, also if someone leaves, which will certainly happen, it will ruin any balance that the creator tried (and most likely failed) to add.

Yet, you would know this if you played Afterwind enough.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
11.04.2012 - 16:00
Don't you know what a scenario is? it's just a game with a fancy picture where the goal is to quit as soon as possible,making it unfair.
trust me,i've seen alot
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
atWar

About Us
Contact

حریم خصوصی | شرایط و قوانین | بنرها | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

به ما بپیوندید در

گسترش این کلمه