24.10.2014 - 20:18
He would be a mix between Tito's retardation and hitlers K/D ratio
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
25.10.2014 - 12:31
Discrimination? Kek. I had an argument with Hdrakon where he was saying all Anglos deserved to die. I replied in kind and who gets muted on room chat? Me. Does hdrakon? No. Where is the balance there? Hdrakon has a much worse past than I yet he wasn't punished and I was? Zero balance. All the forums that were closed were vindicated by other mods. Ruling that any punishment against me was unjustified as I never broke any rules or advocated violence. Everything I said was backed up by verified sources. Disagreeing with someone does not give you the right to punish them.
Screen shots of what? Having a discussions with facts and sources backing what I say?
Playing the victim. How pathetic. Anti Slav comments? HA HA. Where did I make Anti-Slav comments? The worst I've done is call Tito an Alby (Albanian) and occasionally troll him after he trolls me with his Anti-British rhetoric. It's usually in good fun. I like Slavs. They are comrades in struggle. Ironically, I had a conversation with Tito about how race and genetics affected Balkan production and politics. He was the one asking if racial purity was the reason Serbian republic territory was more productive than Southern Bosnian's. I disagreed, I said it's not a racial issue as most people in the Balkans share an identical genetic history. It's mostly cultural and environmental. Then he says Croatians are all Asiatic. Which is daft. So there I am, defending Bosnian Muslims and their lack of production against Tito claiming racial superiority among Serbs. The world quite literally turned on its head for 5 minutes then switched back again after he then claimed Diversity was a good thing. (Honestly Tito, the cognitive dissonance you hold is startling) After how many years of argument and autistic discussion, have I ever not been consistent? I study the data and I dictate based upon the data. I don't hold personal feelings about the data other than self interest. The data speaks for itself. Besides, when have you ever had the balls to discuss with me? Exactly. You'd play the victim. You are a victim because you make yourself a victim. You want to see mods being racial? Go check the Mexican section of Atwar where Columna Durruti says Tunder lives in 'Gringo-Land.'
Or in his coalition where he openly talks about SCALPING 'Nationalists' while other mods blaze a hammer and sickle. http://atwar-game.com/cln/cln.php?cln_id=298 "We're here to scalp our way to Freedom" Would it be Ok for someone to advocate scalping their way through Israel for Palestinian freedom? So it's Ok for mods to advocate political and ethnic violence, in a country like China where there was an open and mass genocide of people under Mao. But if someone discusses a controversial topic without any avocation of violence while using sources to back up points, then its bad. Denying a Jewish historical genocide event is BANNED. Promoting and advocating a historical genocide under Mao is not only OK, it's seen as a good thing on a coalition page. Why the hypocrisy Magic? Why are you content with someone who does advocate violence, torture and murder for political gain but you disagree with modship of someone whose worst offense is denying history? Other than the conversation with Hdrakon where both parties were as malicious as the other. I have done no wrong. Having a Fascist in the moderation would actually balance it out. I wont have admin power, I cant do anything out of league because if I did, I'd be stripped of it. I'd also be under extra scrutiny for any action I take. The fact is, the community is calling for a balance in moderation. A person who isn't a Yes Man, who isn't a knee jerk reactionary to the slightest bit of controversy, and who will stand up to other mods if they make poor decisions. I'm not here to cuase disunity or "BAN THE NON ARYANS OF ATWAR." I just want some balance and fairness.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
25.10.2014 - 16:48
The same lie told over, and over, and over. I am a Fascist who seeks the interests of his people. I have not once said others peoples are not capable. Nor have I said they shouldnt look out for their interests. Also, you say Yugoslavia was amazing, now you claim it is backward. Which is it? You can't even remain consistent within a single post.
I love how you are switching this around. I screen capped our conversations. Do you want others to see them? To see how you talk when the public eye isn't on you? You claimed Croatians were not White and that they were Asians. You said Serbians were pure while Southern Bosnians were not which is why the Serbian Republic was doing better. I disagreed and said Bosnia iss mostly mountainous while the North is flatland and rivers which are better for infrastructure building and trade. You denied this and claimed mountains were better for cattle rearing. (HA HA) You even said that the cost of building housing and roads were the same for flatland's and mountains. (LOLOL) I'm certain now that you play a persona after our last conversation when you SUDDENLY spoke perfect English and admitted to your own personal special 'chosen' ethnic bias. Again, all screen capped, buddy. Then you went off on a tangent about Brazil being some glorious multicultural (code for multiracial) superpower that will rise to the top in 200 years. A hilarious joke. Brazil is segregated racially. Its southern whiter portions are affluent while its not so white counterparts are poor. The nation itself is ripped apart by mass crime, gang violence and constant anger against a government you claim to love so much. You claim this system has 2 centuries to live? What planet are you on? The current establishment has 20 years, maximum. Then it will crumble.
I actually said it was because the south was mostly mountains while the north was flat lands. I also said Islam was a factor because it creates divisions among the populations so that most Balkan populations act like city states who only care for their own.
All Croats say this? From how far back are we talking? 20-30,000 year migrations are pretty far off from today's migrations. You do understand that? Oh wait, you think the world is 6000 years old. HA HA HA HA. EES SIENSE! I DO MATH! U C!
Except White people who want to live among themselves? Funny that. You enforce Multi racialism yet claim its self determined.
No they don't, and they aren't. Some foolish Hungarians make this claim and its not true either. There is almost no Turkish genetic heritage in the Balkans. They were vassal states that were dominated by Slavic lords who were ottoman puppets. Turk soldiers weren't pleasant but they made no major genetic change among the Balkan territories. In Greece, the Greeks more or less evicted Turkish peoples. Western Turks are more Greek than Turk but the Turks ethnically cleansed most of their Greek populations.
Jesus Christ, why do you pretend to be stupid on the internet? This persona is ridiculous. The Asian heritage of people in the Balkans is less than 1%. It's so insignificant. Now you play the fallacy of mixing Multiculturalism with Multi racialism. I've pointed out why people like you do this. You refuse to admit race exists so call it Multiculturalism. But you aren't discussing culture, you are talking about race. To admit muftiple races improve society would mean to admit that races are different enough to cause a change. If they were all the same like you said, they wouldn't cause any change. You have also mixed genetics with culture. So are you now claiming culture is a direct result from genetics and race? Do you even understand haplogroups? No you don't.
Based upon what evidence? You can't even define diversity. Is a homogeneous white society better for white citizens? Yes. This is concrete fact. There is no opposing evidence to this. You have even pointed out white privilege before. If whites are privileged then surely they live better off among themselves? Which they have and do. Multi racial social policy doesn't benefit white peoples in white nations. It harms them.
Yugoslavia was White but it still fell apart due to inner tribal conflict. Europe is different from America. America is a mixed European country made up of different European groups. In America these WHITE groups united. In Europe, they remained divided. We also don't see anything like Yugoslavia in Africa or in Australoid territories over a 10,000 period. Yugoslavia became what it was due to white culture and genetics.
How is trade and example of 'diversity?' Why would anyone oppose foreign investment? Did Yugoslavia import millions of third worlders from Africa or the Middle East? No, it didn't. It wasn't entirely homogeneous in terms of tribalism. But it was genetically homogeneous.
And yet your beautiful society failed, did it not? Destroyed by its own inner turmoil of multiple cultures not getting along? This happens in every Empire. From Rome, Austria Hungary to the Soviet Union. The interests of nationalists and tribalism always destroy the whole. The same will happen in America. Europe right now is having mini nationalist revolts in Venetia, Catalonia etc. Multiculturalism failed, utterly. It was NEVER meant to succeed. For the Marxists, they were voters who brought about western chaos. For the Capitalist, it was cheap labor. For both, it was a distraction from their collusion. Nationalism is the default setting and will always keep returning.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Black Shark اکانت حذف شد |
01.11.2014 - 01:10 Black Shark اکانت حذف شد
Tito git gud scrub computers are better use a HDMI cable.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
01.11.2014 - 11:36
yes thats right, cause every shit for brains who spends his life killing other people so the weapon manufacturers and the bankers can get richer, deserves respect.Humanity is doomed, with brains like that, i tell you.
Didnt Usa funded and trained the mujahedin?Didnt they practically helped create the talibans and the Alqaida?Didnt they helped Sadam in the same way?30 years later arent you doing the same mistake with Libya and Syria? If you are concerned with tyrants,injustice and building a better world (lol), why didnt u helped Rwanda and congo?You let 3 millions die horibly, because it was an "internal conflict" but you interfered with Mid East internal conflicts and Yugoslavias.Nice double standards. What about Khmer Rouge against Cambodians in the 1970s?What about extermination of Kurds?Sudan, anyone? And lets not talk about Indonesia?Where were you when Indonesia was torturing, executing and genociding in East Timur?Oh, you were supporting the murderers, thats right.Hypocrisy.
what evidence do you need?That national debt in US/EU rises each year, or that EU/US have the highest debt?And no tirp, not everyone has too much debts.The plan of the banking elite to dominate, is purely Western. http://www.economist.com/content/global_debt_clock http://useconomy.about.com/od/usdebtanddeficit/a/National-Debt-by-Year.htm
Nato had no fucking business to impose any sanctions.Nato is fucking rogue.Eu citizens didnt support this.Nato is out of control and we, the citizens, will pay the price, as always.I really really wish Greece exits EU and Euro.I dont care if Nato attacks us after, atleast our enemy will be visible and we can use the army, cause right now all EU citizens are under attack by their governments.As for the sanctions,do you really want me to state reasons, why the sanctions were plain stupid?As for the second part, what kind of argument is that bro, are you serious now?Just cause Russian citizens are gonna be in shit also, then all is ok?So we prefer, that we sink in shit, as long as we take "our enemies" with us too, is that it?
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Black Shark اکانت حذف شد |
02.11.2014 - 00:55 Black Shark اکانت حذف شد what. 20 gb RAM? Is that even possible with 400 dollars lel.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
22.11.2014 - 09:37
Yeah, right. That crazy bitch as mod? Rather have a donkey stick a carrot up my ass while Godzilla shoots fireballs of shit all over my nipples.
---- "insert quote here" -"insert famous person here"
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Black Shark اکانت حذف شد |
23.11.2014 - 04:01 Black Shark اکانت حذف شد 3/4 is a huge exagerration but they still had a lot of land. And max pop as far as I knew GB had 400 million, idk about colonial.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
23.11.2014 - 05:49
Seriously don't revive this thread then please...
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
12.09.2018 - 13:22
Wow thank you Waffel
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
13.09.2018 - 07:41
And 4 years later, you compare me to tik-tok.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
آیا مطمئنید؟