Continuous peace

When you start a game everybody is at peace with everyone and you can ally people at the first turn and for some reason there is a button for declaring war even though it does it automatically next turn. so instead of the war button put peace this way if the other person accepts then you will have a peace treaty until you ally or war him. and if you don't want to ally or have a peace treaty then do nothing war is declared next turn automatically.

Things like this were proposed infinite times, but for some reason that i can not undestand Amok and Ivan dont want to add this.

It's pretty stupid when I forget to peace someone and then 10 turns later he comes a knockin'. I don't thnk that's how real-world politics work.

It suspect that the turn 1 peace is to keep players from capping each other on the first move - which is kind of cheese if you think about it. After that....

The game is called at-war. I suppose Ivan and Amok could change it to at-peace if they implemented this. Yes?

نوشتع شده توسط mr.seven, 17.05.2013 at 15:20

It suspect that the turn 1 peace is to keep players from capping each other on the first move - which is kind of cheese if you think about it. After that....

The game is called at-war. I suppose Ivan and Amok could change it to at-peace if they implemented this. Yes?

There should be an option to keep peace in first turn.
The game name was (and still being for me) afterwind, and it was a better name.
Also, the name of this game should be AllyFag.

نوشتع شده توسط mr.seven, 17.05.2013 at 15:20

It suspect that the turn 1 peace is to keep players from capping each other on the first move - which is kind of cheese if you think about it. After that....

The game is called at-war. I suppose Ivan and Amok could change it to at-peace if they implemented this. Yes?

This is exactly the reason first turn peace was created and obviously was a good change. I think it should stay the same but with the option for peace, presently it is full alliance or nothing.

I support this idea