Ouch پست ها: 72 از جانب: USA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f59/65f595501c265f5c93e2f114edb9fb0ab7bab637" alt="" |
It is a good idea to the fact that submarines dont have a great capacity currently anyways...
----
-Man on a Mission
AkA berserk
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Homero پست ها: 78 از جانب: لهستان
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c8a1/3c8a1c509263224252c24c6090a881d53b98d0b3" alt="" |
I would leave subs capacity where it is. They can transport 4 with MoS which I feel it's all right already.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Homero پست ها: 78 از جانب: لهستان
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c8a1/3c8a1c509263224252c24c6090a881d53b98d0b3" alt="" |
Well maybe because AT primary role is to transport. Subs main role is surprise attack (in theory). Transport option is somehow a bonus like for helicopters in DS, and I know that in practice subs are just stealth transports rarely used for attacks but that doesn't mean they should be underwater transport for 4-5 units with 7 or 9 attack and stealth. If we go with capacity II why not make them benefit from Safer Transportation's +3 HP?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Its ok how it is 5 is just no needed
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|