What is David's opinion of RP?

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 17:39

نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 09.12.2018 at 17:06

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 16:58

Wrong the game was thriving before rp went and lowered the skill threshold to non existent.

RP could fill 3 game with 60 players nad 20 player in each game, and there were more player playing this game.
I understand Rp player back in the day like to troll and quit game or ruin competitive game like ultimate WWII or team game or gang play in FFA game like colonial game .
We could make a social credit system, where each player can get rated as a troll, RP player, or/ and noob. Like upvote or reputation system, player are more likely to kick them so a game can run good.
Also RP game can make player toxic with one another because of a beef in a previous game where they get betray or backstab, I suggest a New game option where Player in a game are given igconito mode, where you can see player name tag or view profile until game finish.
1) solution is to design a social credit system that rate player base of their tendency to troll, are noob, or is a RP player.
2) New game option call icognito mode.

Your missing my point. What good is 60 players in three rps to the rest of the community? They stole a entire generation of atwar. Tought them nothing made them toxic retards who dont contribute to anything, to kill the real atwar and created a far far worse alternative community. Its partially why people are so toxic now. Before rp those 60 players would of filled real maps and learned reusable skills and helped progress the community. Rp instead deprived the actual game of a intellectual player base that is required to fill and play in competitive and role based scenarios.

You are pointing in the wrong direction. You shouldn't go and blame the people playing roleplay, they are the sheep. Blame the shepherds that foster and urge them on.

Also Helly, don't go lashing at me for being a retiring role-play leader, look higher up.

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 09.12.2018 at 17:48

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 17:39

نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 09.12.2018 at 17:06

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 16:58

Wrong the game was thriving before rp went and lowered the skill threshold to non existent.

RP could fill 3 game with 60 players nad 20 player in each game, and there were more player playing this game.
I understand Rp player back in the day like to troll and quit game or ruin competitive game like ultimate WWII or team game or gang play in FFA game like colonial game .
We could make a social credit system, where each player can get rated as a troll, RP player, or/ and noob. Like upvote or reputation system, player are more likely to kick them so a game can run good.
Also RP game can make player toxic with one another because of a beef in a previous game where they get betray or backstab, I suggest a New game option where Player in a game are given igconito mode, where you can see player name tag or view profile until game finish.
1) solution is to design a social credit system that rate player base of their tendency to troll, are noob, or is a RP player.
2) New game option call icognito mode.

Your missing my point. What good is 60 players in three rps to the rest of the community? They stole a entire generation of atwar. Tought them nothing made them toxic retards who dont contribute to anything, to kill the real atwar and created a far far worse alternative community. Its partially why people are so toxic now. Before rp those 60 players would of filled real maps and learned reusable skills and helped progress the community. Rp instead deprived the actual game of a intellectual player base that is required to fill and play in competitive and role based scenarios.

You are pointing in the wrong direction. You shouldn't go and blame the people playing roleplay, they are the sheep. Blame the shepherds that foster and urge them on.

Also Helly, don't go lashing at me for being a retiring role-play leader, look higher up.

Cant go any higher then banning roleplay. Remove rp, or make it a side mini game, and watch atwar improve in strides.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 18:00

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 09.12.2018 at 17:48

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 17:39

نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 09.12.2018 at 17:06

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 16:58

Wrong the game was thriving before rp went and lowered the skill threshold to non existent.

RP could fill 3 game with 60 players nad 20 player in each game, and there were more player playing this game.
I understand Rp player back in the day like to troll and quit game or ruin competitive game like ultimate WWII or team game or gang play in FFA game like colonial game .
We could make a social credit system, where each player can get rated as a troll, RP player, or/ and noob. Like upvote or reputation system, player are more likely to kick them so a game can run good.
Also RP game can make player toxic with one another because of a beef in a previous game where they get betray or backstab, I suggest a New game option where Player in a game are given igconito mode, where you can see player name tag or view profile until game finish.
1) solution is to design a social credit system that rate player base of their tendency to troll, are noob, or is a RP player.
2) New game option call icognito mode.

Your missing my point. What good is 60 players in three rps to the rest of the community? They stole a entire generation of atwar. Tought them nothing made them toxic retards who dont contribute to anything, to kill the real atwar and created a far far worse alternative community. Its partially why people are so toxic now. Before rp those 60 players would of filled real maps and learned reusable skills and helped progress the community. Rp instead deprived the actual game of a intellectual player base that is required to fill and play in competitive and role based scenarios.

You are pointing in the wrong direction. You shouldn't go and blame the people playing roleplay, they are the sheep. Blame the shepherds that foster and urge them on.

Also Helly, don't go lashing at me for being a retiring role-play leader, look higher up.

Cant go any higher then banning roleplay. Remove rp, or make it a side mini game, and watch atwar improve in strides.

Let's use prostitution as a example, you can't stamp it out. You can only regulate it.

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 09.12.2018 at 18:26

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 18:00

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 09.12.2018 at 17:48

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 17:39

نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 09.12.2018 at 17:06

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 16:58

Wrong the game was thriving before rp went and lowered the skill threshold to non existent.

RP could fill 3 game with 60 players nad 20 player in each game, and there were more player playing this game.
I understand Rp player back in the day like to troll and quit game or ruin competitive game like ultimate WWII or team game or gang play in FFA game like colonial game .
We could make a social credit system, where each player can get rated as a troll, RP player, or/ and noob. Like upvote or reputation system, player are more likely to kick them so a game can run good.
Also RP game can make player toxic with one another because of a beef in a previous game where they get betray or backstab, I suggest a New game option where Player in a game are given igconito mode, where you can see player name tag or view profile until game finish.
1) solution is to design a social credit system that rate player base of their tendency to troll, are noob, or is a RP player.
2) New game option call icognito mode.

Your missing my point. What good is 60 players in three rps to the rest of the community? They stole a entire generation of atwar. Tought them nothing made them toxic retards who dont contribute to anything, to kill the real atwar and created a far far worse alternative community. Its partially why people are so toxic now. Before rp those 60 players would of filled real maps and learned reusable skills and helped progress the community. Rp instead deprived the actual game of a intellectual player base that is required to fill and play in competitive and role based scenarios.

You are pointing in the wrong direction. You shouldn't go and blame the people playing roleplay, they are the sheep. Blame the shepherds that foster and urge them on.

Also Helly, don't go lashing at me for being a retiring role-play leader, look higher up.

Cant go any higher then banning roleplay. Remove rp, or make it a side mini game, and watch atwar improve in strides.

Let's use prostitution as a example, you can't stamp it out. You can only regulate it.

But you can, this isnt a country it's a business.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 18:31

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 09.12.2018 at 18:26

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 18:00

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 09.12.2018 at 17:48

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 17:39

نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 09.12.2018 at 17:06

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 16:58

Wrong the game was thriving before rp went and lowered the skill threshold to non existent.

RP could fill 3 game with 60 players nad 20 player in each game, and there were more player playing this game.
I understand Rp player back in the day like to troll and quit game or ruin competitive game like ultimate WWII or team game or gang play in FFA game like colonial game .
We could make a social credit system, where each player can get rated as a troll, RP player, or/ and noob. Like upvote or reputation system, player are more likely to kick them so a game can run good.
Also RP game can make player toxic with one another because of a beef in a previous game where they get betray or backstab, I suggest a New game option where Player in a game are given igconito mode, where you can see player name tag or view profile until game finish.
1) solution is to design a social credit system that rate player base of their tendency to troll, are noob, or is a RP player.
2) New game option call icognito mode.

Your missing my point. What good is 60 players in three rps to the rest of the community? They stole a entire generation of atwar. Tought them nothing made them toxic retards who dont contribute to anything, to kill the real atwar and created a far far worse alternative community. Its partially why people are so toxic now. Before rp those 60 players would of filled real maps and learned reusable skills and helped progress the community. Rp instead deprived the actual game of a intellectual player base that is required to fill and play in competitive and role based scenarios.

You are pointing in the wrong direction. You shouldn't go and blame the people playing roleplay, they are the sheep. Blame the shepherds that foster and urge them on.

Also Helly, don't go lashing at me for being a retiring role-play leader, look higher up.

Cant go any higher then banning roleplay. Remove rp, or make it a side mini game, and watch atwar improve in strides.

Let's use prostitution as a example, you can't stamp it out. You can only regulate it.

But you can, this isnt a country it's a business.

Okay say I create a map... that has a bunch of cities and a bunch of units and then I lay out some rules for how I want my map to be played. If a staff member sees my map... it will just get deleted?

Or say... I create a normal map with 50k funds and declare it RP... how will staff stop that?

We don't delete any maps unless they are blatant farm maps. We'll look at it as a team to determine if it's SP needs to be nerfed, but unless it is an obvious map that is private and is not used for actual gameplay, we won't delete it.

Seems to me many people here are forgetting that. We won't delete RP, so its a useless discussion really

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 09.12.2018 at 18:33

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 18:31

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 09.12.2018 at 18:26

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 18:00

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 09.12.2018 at 17:48

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 17:39

نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 09.12.2018 at 17:06

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 09.12.2018 at 16:58

Wrong the game was thriving before rp went and lowered the skill threshold to non existent.

RP could fill 3 game with 60 players nad 20 player in each game, and there were more player playing this game.
I understand Rp player back in the day like to troll and quit game or ruin competitive game like ultimate WWII or team game or gang play in FFA game like colonial game .
We could make a social credit system, where each player can get rated as a troll, RP player, or/ and noob. Like upvote or reputation system, player are more likely to kick them so a game can run good.
Also RP game can make player toxic with one another because of a beef in a previous game where they get betray or backstab, I suggest a New game option where Player in a game are given igconito mode, where you can see player name tag or view profile until game finish.
1) solution is to design a social credit system that rate player base of their tendency to troll, are noob, or is a RP player.
2) New game option call icognito mode.

Your missing my point. What good is 60 players in three rps to the rest of the community? They stole a entire generation of atwar. Tought them nothing made them toxic retards who dont contribute to anything, to kill the real atwar and created a far far worse alternative community. Its partially why people are so toxic now. Before rp those 60 players would of filled real maps and learned reusable skills and helped progress the community. Rp instead deprived the actual game of a intellectual player base that is required to fill and play in competitive and role based scenarios.

You are pointing in the wrong direction. You shouldn't go and blame the people playing roleplay, they are the sheep. Blame the shepherds that foster and urge them on.

Also Helly, don't go lashing at me for being a retiring role-play leader, look higher up.

Cant go any higher then banning roleplay. Remove rp, or make it a side mini game, and watch atwar improve in strides.

Let's use prostitution as a example, you can't stamp it out. You can only regulate it.

But you can, this isnt a country it's a business.

Okay say I create a map... that has a bunch of cities and a bunch of units and then I lay out some rules for how I want my map to be played. If a staff member sees my map... it will just ge deleted?

Or say... I create a normal map with 50k funds and declare it RP... how will staff stop that?

Because rp is distinct, I'm not even saying delete rp, it should be incentivised to play real maps. While making rp not count twards progression.

نوشتع شده توسط Sultan of Swing, 09.12.2018 at 18:39

We don't delete any maps unless they are blatant farm maps. We'll look at it as a team to determine if it's SP needs to be nerfed, but unless it is an obvious map that is private and is not used for actual gameplay, we won't delete it.

Seems to me many people here are forgetting that. We won't delete RP, so its a useless discussion really

Unless our new admin tells you to lol, This discussion was reopened because our new admin may have a diferent stance then our old ones. This wasnt for our useless moderator team it was for our new admin.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 10:45

نوشتع شده توسط Sultan of Swing, 09.12.2018 at 18:39

We don't delete any maps unless they are blatant farm maps. We'll look at it as a team to determine if it's SP needs to be nerfed, but unless it is an obvious map that is private and is not used for actual gameplay, we won't delete it.

Seems to me many people here are forgetting that. We won't delete RP, so its a useless discussion really

Unless our new admin tells you to lol, This discussion was reopened because our new admin may have a diferent stance then our old ones. This wasnt for our useless moderator team it was for our new admin.

Whoever the admin is, is irrelevant. It's a created map by the community and it won't be deleted. I've seen the RP maps, they're pretty cancerous, but theres not need to delete them. A simple SP nerf will do

نوشتع شده توسط Sultan of Swing, 10.12.2018 at 11:26

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 10:45

نوشتع شده توسط Sultan of Swing, 09.12.2018 at 18:39

We don't delete any maps unless they are blatant farm maps. We'll look at it as a team to determine if it's SP needs to be nerfed, but unless it is an obvious map that is private and is not used for actual gameplay, we won't delete it.

Seems to me many people here are forgetting that. We won't delete RP, so its a useless discussion really

Unless our new admin tells you to lol, This discussion was reopened because our new admin may have a diferent stance then our old ones. This wasnt for our useless moderator team it was for our new admin.

Whoever the admin is, is irrelevant. It's a created map by the community and it won't be deleted. I've seen the RP maps, they're pretty cancerous, but theres not need to delete them. A simple SP nerf will do

Well I misread what you ment my bad.

نوشتع شده توسط Sultan of Swing, 09.12.2018 at 18:39

We don't delete any maps unless they are blatant farm maps. We'll look at it as a team to determine if it's SP needs to be nerfed, but unless it is an obvious map that is private and is not used for actual gameplay, we won't delete it.

Seems to me many people here are forgetting that. We won't delete RP, so its a useless discussion really

no one is asking you to delete RP. We just want the admin's opinion and maybe a 0% SP modifier

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse, rp reduced the skill threshold which made the game leagues less entertaining and caused the niche audiance this game retained to lose interest and leave.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

That's from our own new admins mouth. I'll link to it.
https://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=39498

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

The average rank of a roleplay game is 5 and during certain time's it can be 7. Scenario games require both skill and rank. As of right now their are no resources that are easily attainable by low ranks to gain those skill and rank. In a scenario game a common thing that is thrown around is "You are too low rank to play x country" but without trying and gaining the experience, scenarios don't appeal to the low rank basis.

Instead of pointing fingers at roleplay and call for it's ban think about the root of it's problem and why people flock to roleplay. Make some good guides and tips for players to play scenarios and that would draw people to more high skilled games.

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 10.12.2018 at 17:10

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

The average rank of a roleplay game is 5 and during certain time's it can be 7. Scenario games require both skill and rank. As of right now their are no resources that are easily attainable by low ranks to gain those skill and rank. In a scenario game a common thing that is thrown around is "You are too low rank to play x country" but without trying and gaining the experience, scenarios don't appeal to the low rank basis.

Instead of pointing fingers at roleplay and call for it's ban think about the root of it's problem and why people flock to roleplay. Make some good guides and tips for players to play scenarios and that would draw people to more high skilled games.

Lies the rank of rp is the same as any other as you have fostered atleast three generation on roleplay, players who occassionally try other maps, utterly fail because they did not learn to play, trash and troll the community because they are compensating then disappear into obscurity because they get bored of rp.

Again before roleplay we managed just fine. So I'm tired of the excuses that its communities fault, take responsibility for the fact that it is the individual, the supplier, and the community it has built fault.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

Bro, you're not making any sense to me. You're saying it's rp's fault that you can't play scenarios? Seriously??

It is all excuses, before rp we had to learn to play via trial and error and befriending those who could mentor us. Now in a rp era it's ok to suck because at war is hard lol. I WANT FREE PREMIUM AND ALL THE SPS GIMME GIMME GIMME. GAME TO HARD MAKE IT EAZIER FOR DAH KANG, IM A BIG TIME BALLER I DESERVE TO WIN ALLY FAG THE KANG IM A FUXING GAWD.

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:25

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

Bro, you're not making any sense to me. You're saying it's rp's fault that you can't play scenarios? Seriously??

Yes seriously you killed generations of potential players to fill slots in scenarios, by giving them a false sense of accomplishment in rp, causing them to never learn the skills required to play the damn game.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 17:28

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:25

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

Bro, you're not making any sense to me. You're saying it's rp's fault that you can't play scenarios? Seriously??

Yes seriously you killed generations of potential players to fill slots in scenarios, by giving them a false sense of accomplishment in rp, causing them to never learn the skills required to play the damn game.

Okay. Tell me how does a low rank get skills to play the "damn" game. Surely they can't with host kicking low ranks left and right, and forbidding anyone from playing most scenarios with rank join limits. The only way currently that I can think of is the War to End All wars that is hosted in the beginners room, but that is filled with alts and is just a farm for some people.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 17:28

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:25

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

Bro, you're not making any sense to me. You're saying it's rp's fault that you can't play scenarios? Seriously??

Yes seriously you killed generations of potential players to fill slots in scenarios, by giving them a false sense of accomplishment in rp, causing them to never learn the skills required to play the damn game.

That sounds completely ridiculous to me.

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:45

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 17:28

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:25

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

Bro, you're not making any sense to me. You're saying it's rp's fault that you can't play scenarios? Seriously??

Yes seriously you killed generations of potential players to fill slots in scenarios, by giving them a false sense of accomplishment in rp, causing them to never learn the skills required to play the damn game.

That sounds completely ridiculous to me.

Well your a role player makes perfect sense to regular players.

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 10.12.2018 at 17:42

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 17:28

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:25

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

Bro, you're not making any sense to me. You're saying it's rp's fault that you can't play scenarios? Seriously??

Yes seriously you killed generations of potential players to fill slots in scenarios, by giving them a false sense of accomplishment in rp, causing them to never learn the skills required to play the damn game.

Okay. Tell me how does a low rank get skills to play the "damn" game. Surely they can't with host kicking low ranks left and right, and forbidding anyone from playing most scenarios with rank join limits. The only way currently that I can think of is the War to End All wars that is hosted in the beginners room, but that is filled with alts and is just a farm for some people.

How did anyone survive being a low rank by your fucked up logic lol.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 18:01

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 10.12.2018 at 17:42

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 17:28

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:25

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

Bro, you're not making any sense to me. You're saying it's rp's fault that you can't play scenarios? Seriously??

Yes seriously you killed generations of potential players to fill slots in scenarios, by giving them a false sense of accomplishment in rp, causing them to never learn the skills required to play the damn game.

Okay. Tell me how does a low rank get skills to play the "damn" game. Surely they can't with host kicking low ranks left and right, and forbidding anyone from playing most scenarios with rank join limits. The only way currently that I can think of is the War to End All wars that is hosted in the beginners room, but that is filled with alts and is just a farm for some people.

How did anyone survive being a low rank by your fucked up logic lol.

My logic if it wasn't clear to you is
> Low rank's can not learn skills because high rank's don't want to teach them
> Roleplay provides a almost non-rankist env for members to just play a game.

Now I must ask you, what steps should a low rank take to gain skills.

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 10.12.2018 at 18:04

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 18:01

نوشتع شده توسط Asylan, 10.12.2018 at 17:42

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 17:28

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:25

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

Bro, you're not making any sense to me. You're saying it's rp's fault that you can't play scenarios? Seriously??

Yes seriously you killed generations of potential players to fill slots in scenarios, by giving them a false sense of accomplishment in rp, causing them to never learn the skills required to play the damn game.

Okay. Tell me how does a low rank get skills to play the "damn" game. Surely they can't with host kicking low ranks left and right, and forbidding anyone from playing most scenarios with rank join limits. The only way currently that I can think of is the War to End All wars that is hosted in the beginners room, but that is filled with alts and is just a farm for some people.

How did anyone survive being a low rank by your fucked up logic lol.

My logic if it wasn't clear to you is
> Low rank's can not learn skills because high rank's don't want to teach them
> Roleplay provides a almost non-rankist env for members to just play a game.

Now I must ask you, what steps should a low rank take to gain skills.

I agree more needs to be done to teach new players how to play. I disagree roleplay is acceptable because of that though.

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 18:00

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:45

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 17:28

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 17:25

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:55

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:37

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:30

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 16:24

نوشتع شده توسط Helly, 10.12.2018 at 16:23

نوشتع شده توسط Lelouch., 10.12.2018 at 15:39

There's no point in this discussion. I don't see why people seriously complain about rp in general. The only reasons I can think of are that rp reduces the overall level of skill for players, and that you get decent sp by playing rp. Complaining for both of these reasons is silly, because rp has a much bigger positive impact on the game. It draws players in to play the game. It promotes creativity and variety in gameplay. There are no practical or significant reasons why rp should be removed, or why the incentive for playing it should be reduced.

We had far more players prior to rps inception in 2014 your entire post is a farse.

Show me the statistics. Otherwise, your claim is a farce. I wanna see if it's true that the game's decrease in popularity is directly linked to the introduction of rp games.

It has nothing to do with roleplaying it has everything to do with the version of play created here on atwar. Which is gang banging ally fagging, sp farming, the whole time pretending like you have a justification to control Indonesia because they are asian or some stupid shit you guys come up with.

The problem with ally fagging and sp farming is mainly due to people caring about sp. People care about sp mainly because there are upgrades in the game and because there's an sp ranking system. With respect to just ally fagging, people also just want to win. And your chances to winning tend to increase with the number of alliances you have. If you don't like that, then remove alliances from the game. But wait! People can still ally each other by just not attacking each other. So, even removing alliances form the game wouldn't solve the problem. The problem then is the free-for-all game mode itself. So, just play team games if you don't wanna get ally fagged.

The true problem then is that only premiums can make team games. This is bullshit in my opinion.

No your making excuses before rp we had upgrades, we got our ass kicked by the beta troopers, we persevered and had a sense of accomplishment. I want to personally play scenarios which I cant fill because you and people like you cant fucking play and that's because of rp.

Bro, you're not making any sense to me. You're saying it's rp's fault that you can't play scenarios? Seriously??

Yes seriously you killed generations of potential players to fill slots in scenarios, by giving them a false sense of accomplishment in rp, causing them to never learn the skills required to play the damn game.

That sounds completely ridiculous to me.

Well your a role player makes perfect sense to regular players.

Look at my game history and then ask yourself if I'm a role player. -.- Man... You really just like to run your mouth about anything that bothers you.