|
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Yes but with a nerf of infantry units, no reason an Air Offensive strategy should have 50 cost infantry that has 4 attack and 6 defense.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Garde پست ها: 2842 از جانب: Canada
|
Ofc, shouldn't have left to begin with.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط PleaseMe, 29.03.2019 at 02:03
Yes but with a nerf of infantry units, no reason an Air Offensive strategy should have 50 cost infantry that has 4 attack and 6 defense.
it's not even air offensive. the sentries suck. just use it like a buff version of none strat lol
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط boywind2, 29.03.2019 at 02:46
نوشتع شده توسط PleaseMe, 29.03.2019 at 02:03
Yes but with a nerf of infantry units, no reason an Air Offensive strategy should have 50 cost infantry that has 4 attack and 6 defense.
it's not even air offensive. the sentries suck. just use it like a buff version of none strat lol
Yea probably best to buff those sentries. But everyone only wants it because the infantry units are OP, not because the sentries had anything to do with it.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Yes, it fit right in perfectly with the other strats.
Unlike the abomination of a strat that was inssurection.
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Bring back ci with a new name D
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Garde پست ها: 2842 از جانب: Canada
|
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
Just name it something else
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Garde پست ها: 2842 از جانب: Canada
|
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
Why do you people think this strategy had anything to do with Insurrection? Christ, we've already been over this: The naming conventions were merely coincidental. This really goes to show the low IQ AtWar players have when they can't piece this together on their own.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:40
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
Why do you people think this strategy had anything to do with Insurrection? Christ, we've already been over this: The naming conventions were merely coincidental. This really goes to show the low IQ AtWar players have when they can't piece this together on their own.
Bro dont start to talk like this or cc will be forced to mute me on forum again
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Garde پست ها: 2842 از جانب: Canada
|
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:41
نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:40
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
Why do you people think this strategy had anything to do with Insurrection? Christ, we've already been over this: The naming conventions were merely coincidental. This really goes to show the low IQ AtWar players have when they can't piece this together on their own.
Bro dont start to talk like this or cc will be forced to mute me on forum again
t. egg
But haha, probably. CI is a fine name either way, and I can understand some people's confusion. Insurgency is merely referring to tactical insurgency and the point of CI is to uncover any insurgent scheming and deal with it... by smashing sentries into it.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Definitely agree, the strategy was something nice and new that actually fit in. It countered some strategies while also was able to get countered, which i think is the perfect balance- I honestly don't know why it was taken away, but hopefully we see it returning soon.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Personally, I just want new stuff, regardless if it's shit or not. So I voted yes.
----
*War in Europe again isn't good for anyone... that's why the EU Needs to Evoke and Become the EEC once more, as an International, Nationalist Union Long Live The Realms! Long Live the Europeans!*
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
I thought this was a troll strat (and I didn't test it) and a troll post so it seems it's a good strat
----
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
نوشتع شده توسط Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
ITS COUNTER INSURGENCY
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
some gay haters who dont give 2 shits probably
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Yes. It only needs a minor patch for the strat to be solid.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
Me
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 30.03.2019 at 01:21
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
Me
Any reason why?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
theres always been a silent majority on atwar when it comes to this sorta stuff, is strange indeed
edit: 4 alts have voted though, but the difference between yes and no is more than 4, so doesnt really have major impact. It appears as its more 50/50
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
theres always been a silent majority on atwar when it comes to this sorta stuff, is strange indeed
edit: 4 alts have voted though, but the difference between yes and no is more than 4, so doesnt really have major impact. It appears as its more 50/50
whos alts were they
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Counter-Insurgency needs to come back into the game, but with PD tanks instead of normal tanks. That's really all the strat really needs for balance. Also, MAYBE give just the infantry a +2 defense bonus against marines instead of a +1, since they'd really just have PD defense against marines otherwise.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
NewTea پست ها: 188 از جانب: Canada
|
When was this ever a thing? I don't ever remember it being an option.
----
Planet Howdy Prison = 152/89.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Zzzz 45no. Cl was a nice strat bla
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Bring it back, but with weaker tanks and stronger sentries.
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
The masses has spoken. This is what was asked all those years with strat changes by the "elite". Now the same "elite" try to force it but aint happening. Good thing after all those years they got karma.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|