مطلع حق بیمه برای مخفی کردن تمام تبلیغات
پست ها: 15   بازدید شده توسط: 234 users

مخزن

Should I

Get MoS
26
Save up for GW instead
30

مجموع آراء: 52
24.06.2013 - 07:32
I don't know what to save for, and apparently both are kind of similar, with MoS being cheaper.

Help me decide and give a reason why you pick either MoS or GW. Thanks!
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
24.06.2013 - 07:41
You should firstly unlock GW. Save your sps for it.
----
.10.

atWar Radio<3


play for fun, just for fun.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
24.06.2013 - 07:45
Definitely GW!
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
24.06.2013 - 07:55
نوشتع شده توسط Columna Durruti, 24.06.2013 at 07:45

Definitely GW!


Why? O.o
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
24.06.2013 - 20:55
نوشتع شده توسط zelaznog_22, 24.06.2013 at 07:55

نوشتع شده توسط Columna Durruti, 24.06.2013 at 07:45

Definitely GW!


Why? O.o


Actually it depends what your gaming preferences are.
For Worldgames +15k starting funds, then MoS may be more suitable than GW, considering that you need a fast expansion to have the required fundings for the army you are considering to build.
Otherwise, if you are planning to play EU games with limited starting funds, then definetively GW is OP: cheap marines, and boosted militia (+1 att, +1 def, +2 HP and +2 range). The downside of GW are the transport units. Thats why GW is good in 2 cases: low income environments and/or low range battlefields (EU, for instance).

For my gaming options GW > MoS.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
25.06.2013 - 03:39
Personally I prefer playing with MoS all the time, but in small maps with less income, GW is definitely superior to MoS, but I'm just the person who likes to strike my enemies when they least expect it.
----
"Another such victory and I come back to Epirus alone" - Pyrrhus of Epirus
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
25.06.2013 - 06:31
I've already decided to just get MoS when I get 400 more sp as I play on world maps more. Thanks for the info guys!
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
28.06.2013 - 16:43
GW for me.
----
Love, peace and respect.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
29.06.2013 - 12:09
 x___
MoS
I find it more suitable with my gameplay
----
не смотри где я - лучше смотри где ты
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
08.07.2013 - 09:17
 Prey
What about EU +, what do you guys think? GW or MoS?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
09.07.2013 - 03:13
نوشتع شده توسط Prey, 08.07.2013 at 09:17

What about EU +, what do you guys think? GW or MoS?

Most certainly GW.
----
"Another such victory and I come back to Epirus alone" - Pyrrhus of Epirus
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.07.2013 - 10:45
I cannot play GW in world games. Gimme MoS asap kthx
----
نوشتع شده توسط Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.07.2013 - 15:26
Ld. Dark Knight
اکانت حذف شد
MoS > GW
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
12.07.2013 - 04:28
It pretty much depends on which maps you play.

If you prefer smaller maps like Europe, then GW is more usefull. In worldmaps, i would go for MoS.
----
Exceptional claims demand exceptional evidence.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
12.07.2013 - 22:46
You could do what Hugosch said but GW is way better if you are starting out small in a world map. MoS not really that good if you don't make much money.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
atWar

About Us
Contact

حریم خصوصی | شرایط و قوانین | بنرها | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

به ما بپیوندید در

گسترش این کلمه