Map/Scenario idea

My idea is this; when you are in the lobby you see games like: UN, Ultimate WW2, Roncho cold war, etc...

I suggest to have the option to go to the map section and disable the maps/scenarios you don't want to see from appearing in your lobby

Support.

Care package inbound.

Couldn't this be done with the filter?

To a certain extent the current filters may provide what Vermeer is talking about. But he referrs more to specific games/scenarios being filtered-out (like UN, LOTR, Ice&Fire, etc.). Would it really add to the gaming? How many players would use these new filtering options?

I would

نوشتع شده توسط Columna Durruti, 18.08.2013 at 16:45

To a certain extent the current filters may provide what Vermeer is talking about. But he referrs more to specific games/scenarios being filtered-out (like UN, LOTR, Ice&Fire, etc.). Would it really add to the gaming? How many players would use these new filtering options?

Yes in the current filter system you can't filter out maps or specific scenarios that you wish not to see in your screen. If we had this feature, i and probably handful of people were pleased to use it.

"How many players would use it?" then i guess the admins shouldn't have even bothered to implement the current filter... so i don't see why not to implement this idea

نوشتع شده توسط Vermeer, 19.08.2013 at 05:57

نوشتع شده توسط Columna Durruti, 18.08.2013 at 16:45

To a certain extent the current filters may provide what Vermeer is talking about. But he referrs more to specific games/scenarios being filtered-out (like UN, LOTR, Ice&Fire, etc.). Would it really add to the gaming? How many players would use these new filtering options?

Yes in the current filter system you can't filter out maps or specific scenarios that you wish not to see in your screen. If we had this feature, i and probably handful of people were pleased to use it.

"How many players would use it?" then i guess the admins shouldn't have even bothered to implement the current filter... so i don't see why not to implement this idea

The question's intention was to review the priorities of implementing proposals/changes/upgrades/etc. We have to assume that there are limited resources for the implementation of new ideas; is this one a priority or are other ideas "more urgent" to be implemented? This was the intention of the question. And, like you said, the current filter system is not bad, but I would dare to say that players don't use it. Do they?
It is in no way ment to dismiss the odea, just to give it a certain order of priority.
Cheers.

نوشتع شده توسط Columna Durruti, 19.08.2013 at 07:17

نوشتع شده توسط Vermeer, 19.08.2013 at 05:57

نوشتع شده توسط Columna Durruti, 18.08.2013 at 16:45

To a certain extent the current filters may provide what Vermeer is talking about. But he referrs more to specific games/scenarios being filtered-out (like UN, LOTR, Ice&Fire, etc.). Would it really add to the gaming? How many players would use these new filtering options?

Yes in the current filter system you can't filter out maps or specific scenarios that you wish not to see in your screen. If we had this feature, i and probably handful of people were pleased to use it.

"How many players would use it?" then i guess the admins shouldn't have even bothered to implement the current filter... so i don't see why not to implement this idea

The question's intention was to review the priorities of implementing proposals/changes/upgrades/etc. We have to assume that there are limited resources for the implementation of new ideas; is this one a priority or are other ideas "more urgent" to be implemented? This was the intention of the question. And, like you said, the current filter system is not bad, but I would dare to say that players don't use it. Do they?
It is in no way ment to dismiss the odea, just to give it a certain order of priority.
Cheers.

Oh okay i misunderstood. thanks for clarifying

I would use this. support

Eh.

It's not really the best feature to have. It's very very specific. Basically you'd be stuck on ignoring scenarios, but at the expense of seeing every game that is not a scenario.

This means you'll see private games you will never ever be able to join and not the good old scenarios you might join.

For that reason, I think it's sort of a fluke. You can filter out scenarios for yourself, I'm sure. If this feature were implemented, you'd get everything the filter can't catch while set to it... you get what I'm saying? There's no real need for this specific filter.