|
Yes, omfg age of empire best game ever <#
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Support, and this might make sentry planes more useful.
You silly little puddi! sentry planes are already verry usefull!!!
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Ok ok i see what your talking about i like this idea a Fog of war would be fun to play with
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 03.07.2014 at 19:57
نوشتع شده توسط Goblin, 03.07.2014 at 14:52
I also tought this is about frogs ...my vision was blurry.
I said this already once ...what kind of fog of war are you guys talking about?
• black fog of war? - this is cool for ancient world games, or age of discovery even (would be cool if map makers could customize fog of war for undiscovered areas)
• far units not visible fog of war? - well far units count is not visible now, maybe it would be cool that far far units cant be seen aswell
you can see what im saying in this pic
is that a picture of age of empire game?
Yes, yes it is ...i played all of them, age of mythology too. As you can see there is black unexplored area and foggy area where troops are not visible.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Goblin, 04.07.2014 at 02:51
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 03.07.2014 at 19:57
نوشتع شده توسط Goblin, 03.07.2014 at 14:52
I also tought this is about frogs ...my vision was blurry.
I said this already once ...what kind of fog of war are you guys talking about?
• black fog of war? - this is cool for ancient world games, or age of discovery even (would be cool if map makers could customize fog of war for undiscovered areas)
• far units not visible fog of war? - well far units count is not visible now, maybe it would be cool that far far units cant be seen aswell
you can see what im saying in this pic
is that a picture of age of empire game?
Yes, yes it is ...i played all of them, age of mythology too. As you can see there is black unexplored area and foggy area where troops are not visible.
it similar to that, yes
----
Hi
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Would be great for ancient / medieval games... not so convinced for modern.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
This would make gameplay much more interesting.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
This would be cool. But only in combination with a random country pick as well.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
If a fog of war is implemented, the game will also need to hide battles outside of your viewing range from your overview/battle screen.
I personally play a lot of roleplay games, and I feel that a limited fog of war, where land is visible, but units/battles are not, will be very effective.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
If a fog of war is implemented, the game will also need to hide battles outside of your viewing range from your overview/battle screen.
I personally play a lot of roleplay games, and I feel that a limited fog of war, where land is visible, but units/battles are not, will be very effective.
W/o fog everybody will run to rp, cuz people will make secret alliance, because you want to win cause you know where everyone is
----
Hi
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
4Chan پست ها: 2132 از جانب: اتریش
|
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Would be great for ancient / medieval games... not so convinced for modern.
Maybe be able to turn them off and on in games and maps? That would be good
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
I think this will be a good idea as an option.
Support
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
this is diffrent from warlight.you have free troop movement . unlike being stuck in a border or you can move your unit's view range. Hell, battle dawn is similar to at-war, its just the casual version of at-war. why haven't at-war been sued? at-war's fog will be diffrent from warlight. warlight's fog is based on a piece of land, that is adjacent to its border, or its all fog(heavy fog) or no fog. at-war is like a Light fog version of warlight, why haven't at-war been sued? At-war's fog is based on the unit's view range
----
Hi
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
If a fog of war is implemented, the game will also need to hide battles outside of your viewing range from your overview/battle screen.
I personally play a lot of roleplay games, and I feel that a limited fog of war, where land is visible, but units/battles are not, will be very effective.
rp doesn't need fog, how would you knw if someone is rouge, you will need alot of spies/sentry planes to see
if soeone is rouge
----
Hi
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Azula. پست ها: 1395 از جانب: بلژیک
|
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Support but this should be optional (+add fog)
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Surely this would be v hard to implement...
----
The funny thing about this is by the time you realize that this is completely pointless, it's too late to stop reading.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Black Shark اکانت حذف شد |
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 06.07.2014 at 18:12
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
this is diffrent from warlight.you have free troop movement . unlike being stuck in a border or you can move your unit's view range. Hell, battle dawn is similar to at-war, its just the casual version of at-war. why haven't at-war been sued? at-war's fog will be diffrent from warlight. warlight's fog is based on a piece of land, that is adjacent to its border, or its all fog(heavy fog) or no fog. at-war is like a Light fog version of warlight, why haven't at-war been sued? At-war's fog is based on the unit's view range
Battle Dawn? Being like AW? LOLWUT? ROFLCOPTER
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 01:40
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 06.07.2014 at 18:12
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
this is diffrent from warlight.you have free troop movement . unlike being stuck in a border or you can move your unit's view range. Hell, battle dawn is similar to at-war, its just the casual version of at-war. why haven't at-war been sued? at-war's fog will be diffrent from warlight. warlight's fog is based on a piece of land, that is adjacent to its border, or its all fog(heavy fog) or no fog. at-war is like a Light fog version of warlight, why haven't at-war been sued? At-war's fog is based on the unit's view range
Battle Dawn? Being like AW? LOLWUT? ROFLCOPTER
yes it is similar to aw , Dumb ass
----
Hi
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Black Shark اکانت حذف شد |
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 09:33
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 01:40
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 06.07.2014 at 18:12
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
this is diffrent from warlight.you have free troop movement . unlike being stuck in a border or you can move your unit's view range. Hell, battle dawn is similar to at-war, its just the casual version of at-war. why haven't at-war been sued? at-war's fog will be diffrent from warlight. warlight's fog is based on a piece of land, that is adjacent to its border, or its all fog(heavy fog) or no fog. at-war is like a Light fog version of warlight, why haven't at-war been sued? At-war's fog is based on the unit's view range
Battle Dawn? Being like AW? LOLWUT? ROFLCOPTER
yes it is similar to aw , Dumb ass
Battle Dawn is a game where you save up multiple resources, and win by capturing all of the relics and keeping them until the game ends. There is also another way, but I forgot.
BD doesn't have teams, scenarios or strats in like in AW. In AW you don't build certain buildings to increase your output, you simply waste you units or capture countries/cities.
In BD, you have Ion cannons. You can make something like that in AW, but it's not 1-time use like it is in BD.
BD's recuitment system is different. In BD you join servers, but in AW you have games within a server.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 11:00
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 09:33
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 01:40
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 06.07.2014 at 18:12
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
this is diffrent from warlight.you have free troop movement . unlike being stuck in a border or you can move your unit's view range. Hell, battle dawn is similar to at-war, its just the casual version of at-war. why haven't at-war been sued? at-war's fog will be diffrent from warlight. warlight's fog is based on a piece of land, that is adjacent to its border, or its all fog(heavy fog) or no fog. at-war is like a Light fog version of warlight, why haven't at-war been sued? At-war's fog is based on the unit's view range
Battle Dawn? Being like AW? LOLWUT? ROFLCOPTER
yes it is similar to aw , Dumb ass
Battle Dawn is a game where you save up multiple resources, and win by capturing all of the relics and keeping them until the game ends. There is also another way, but I forgot.
BD doesn't have teams, scenarios or strats in like in AW. In AW you don't build certain buildings to increase your output, you simply waste you units or capture countries/cities.
In BD, you have Ion cannons. You can make something like that in AW, but it's not 1-time use like it is in BD.
BD's recuitment system is different. In BD you join servers, but in AW you have games within a server.
when moving troop
----
Hi
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Black Shark اکانت حذف شد |
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 11:01
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 11:00
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 09:33
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 01:40
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 06.07.2014 at 18:12
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
this is diffrent from warlight.you have free troop movement . unlike being stuck in a border or you can move your unit's view range. Hell, battle dawn is similar to at-war, its just the casual version of at-war. why haven't at-war been sued? at-war's fog will be diffrent from warlight. warlight's fog is based on a piece of land, that is adjacent to its border, or its all fog(heavy fog) or no fog. at-war is like a Light fog version of warlight, why haven't at-war been sued? At-war's fog is based on the unit's view range
Battle Dawn? Being like AW? LOLWUT? ROFLCOPTER
yes it is similar to aw , Dumb ass
Battle Dawn is a game where you save up multiple resources, and win by capturing all of the relics and keeping them until the game ends. There is also another way, but I forgot.
BD doesn't have teams, scenarios or strats in like in AW. In AW you don't build certain buildings to increase your output, you simply waste you units or capture countries/cities.
In BD, you have Ion cannons. You can make something like that in AW, but it's not 1-time use like it is in BD.
BD's recuitment system is different. In BD you join servers, but in AW you have games within a server.
when moving troop
I disagree, AW has free movement but in BD you have to move your squads to either a outpost or a allied city (or a neutral/hostile one, to conquer). You can get around this by spamming outposts, but it costs you.
Btw, moving in BD also costs oil.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 11:03
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 11:01
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 11:00
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 09:33
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 01:40
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 06.07.2014 at 18:12
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
this is diffrent from warlight.you have free troop movement . unlike being stuck in a border or you can move your unit's view range. Hell, battle dawn is similar to at-war, its just the casual version of at-war. why haven't at-war been sued? at-war's fog will be diffrent from warlight. warlight's fog is based on a piece of land, that is adjacent to its border, or its all fog(heavy fog) or no fog. at-war is like a Light fog version of warlight, why haven't at-war been sued? At-war's fog is based on the unit's view range
Battle Dawn? Being like AW? LOLWUT? ROFLCOPTER
yes it is similar to aw , Dumb ass
Battle Dawn is a game where you save up multiple resources, and win by capturing all of the relics and keeping them until the game ends. There is also another way, but I forgot.
BD doesn't have teams, scenarios or strats in like in AW. In AW you don't build certain buildings to increase your output, you simply waste you units or capture countries/cities.
In BD, you have Ion cannons. You can make something like that in AW, but it's not 1-time use like it is in BD.
BD's recuitment system is different. In BD you join servers, but in AW you have games within a server.
when moving troop
I disagree, AW has free movement but in BD you have to move your squads to either a outpost or a allied city (or a neutral/hostile one, to conquer). You can get around this by spamming outposts, but it costs you.
Btw, moving in BD also costs oil.
i says similar movement a casual type not ALL those other type
----
Hi
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
Black Shark اکانت حذف شد |
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 10.08.2014 at 13:39
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 11:03
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 11:01
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 11:00
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 09:33
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 01:40
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 06.07.2014 at 18:12
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
this is diffrent from warlight.you have free troop movement . unlike being stuck in a border or you can move your unit's view range. Hell, battle dawn is similar to at-war, its just the casual version of at-war. why haven't at-war been sued? at-war's fog will be diffrent from warlight. warlight's fog is based on a piece of land, that is adjacent to its border, or its all fog(heavy fog) or no fog. at-war is like a Light fog version of warlight, why haven't at-war been sued? At-war's fog is based on the unit's view range
Battle Dawn? Being like AW? LOLWUT? ROFLCOPTER
yes it is similar to aw , Dumb ass
Battle Dawn is a game where you save up multiple resources, and win by capturing all of the relics and keeping them until the game ends. There is also another way, but I forgot.
BD doesn't have teams, scenarios or strats in like in AW. In AW you don't build certain buildings to increase your output, you simply waste you units or capture countries/cities.
In BD, you have Ion cannons. You can make something like that in AW, but it's not 1-time use like it is in BD.
BD's recuitment system is different. In BD you join servers, but in AW you have games within a server.
when moving troop
I disagree, AW has free movement but in BD you have to move your squads to either a outpost or a allied city (or a neutral/hostile one, to conquer). You can get around this by spamming outposts, but it costs you.
Btw, moving in BD also costs oil.
i says similar movement a casual type not ALL those other type
Casual? Lolwut? Look, BD is not very much like AW at all.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
Adding fog will make game harder.No one would know what their opponents have so the game would last more turns.But still why we need that?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 11.08.2014 at 01:16
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 10.08.2014 at 13:39
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 11:03
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 11:01
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 11:00
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 12.07.2014 at 09:33
نوشتع شده توسط Guest, 12.07.2014 at 01:40
نوشتع شده توسط Htin, 06.07.2014 at 18:12
Dude, this sounds just like Warlight. Do you really want atWar to be sued?
this is diffrent from warlight.you have free troop movement . unlike being stuck in a border or you can move your unit's view range. Hell, battle dawn is similar to at-war, its just the casual version of at-war. why haven't at-war been sued? at-war's fog will be diffrent from warlight. warlight's fog is based on a piece of land, that is adjacent to its border, or its all fog(heavy fog) or no fog. at-war is like a Light fog version of warlight, why haven't at-war been sued? At-war's fog is based on the unit's view range
Battle Dawn? Being like AW? LOLWUT? ROFLCOPTER
yes it is similar to aw , Dumb ass
Battle Dawn is a game where you save up multiple resources, and win by capturing all of the relics and keeping them until the game ends. There is also another way, but I forgot.
BD doesn't have teams, scenarios or strats in like in AW. In AW you don't build certain buildings to increase your output, you simply waste you units or capture countries/cities.
In BD, you have Ion cannons. You can make something like that in AW, but it's not 1-time use like it is in BD.
BD's recuitment system is different. In BD you join servers, but in AW you have games within a server.
when moving troop
I disagree, AW has free movement but in BD you have to move your squads to either a outpost or a allied city (or a neutral/hostile one, to conquer). You can get around this by spamming outposts, but it costs you.
Btw, moving in BD also costs oil.
i says similar movement a casual type not ALL those other type
Casual? Lolwut? Look, BD is not very much like AW at all.
movement is slow
----
Hi
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|
|
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
|