Dear AtWar team

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 25.04.2016 at 09:34

More optional game mechanics and in-game strategy such as that proposed by Metallic Fear would be great for the game - these game elements could add to the games realism as well as providing a lot more objectivity.

man your post has like 2 upvotes yet you still keep supporting your BAD ideas.We like atwar as it is we dont want it to become RP.

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 04:25

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 25.04.2016 at 09:34

More optional game mechanics and in-game strategy such as that proposed by Metallic Fear would be great for the game - these game elements could add to the games realism as well as providing a lot more objectivity.

man your post has like 2 upvotes yet you still keep supporting your BAD ideas.We like atwar as it is we dont want it to become RP.

As an optional extra for those that would like these kind of features for custom map's, it could be a good idea. Just because I support an idea, doesn't mean it will happen, I am also guessing isn't possible due to programming/timescales - I am showing encouragement to those that have expressed an idea to help the game, which would add more diversity to atWar. Sorry to see you don't like that. Furthermore you have played 3 custom map's in 300 days, why would you even have an opinion on this?

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 04:25

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 25.04.2016 at 09:34

More optional game mechanics and in-game strategy such as that proposed by Metallic Fear would be great for the game - these game elements could add to the games realism as well as providing a lot more objectivity.

man your post has like 2 upvotes yet you still keep supporting your BAD ideas.We like atwar as it is we dont want it to become RP.

just because is not a priority doesn't mean is a bad idea. Custom Resources are likely to happen in the future, its just a matter of when.

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 27.04.2016 at 06:16

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 04:25

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 25.04.2016 at 09:34

More optional game mechanics and in-game strategy such as that proposed by Metallic Fear would be great for the game - these game elements could add to the games realism as well as providing a lot more objectivity.

man your post has like 2 upvotes yet you still keep supporting your BAD ideas.We like atwar as it is we dont want it to become RP.

As an optional extra for those that would like these kind of features for custom map's, it could be a good idea. Just because I support an idea, doesn't mean it will happen, I am also guessing isn't possible due to programming/timescales - I am showing encouragement to those that have expressed an idea to help the game, which would add more diversity to atWar. Sorry to see you don't like that. Furthermore you have played 3 custom map's in 300 days, why would you even have an opinion on this?

i didnt talk about custom maps i talked about standard map.And to catch up i havent played custom maps for a long time but I used to.Also i think you were the one who said that "scenarios are for noobs".

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 09:04

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 27.04.2016 at 06:16

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 04:25

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 25.04.2016 at 09:34

More optional game mechanics and in-game strategy such as that proposed by Metallic Fear would be great for the game - these game elements could add to the games realism as well as providing a lot more objectivity.

man your post has like 2 upvotes yet you still keep supporting your BAD ideas.We like atwar as it is we dont want it to become RP.

As an optional extra for those that would like these kind of features for custom map's, it could be a good idea. Just because I support an idea, doesn't mean it will happen, I am also guessing isn't possible due to programming/timescales - I am showing encouragement to those that have expressed an idea to help the game, which would add more diversity to atWar. Sorry to see you don't like that. Furthermore you have played 3 custom map's in 300 days, why would you even have an opinion on this?

i didnt talk about custom maps i talked about standard map.And to catch up i havent played custom maps for a long time but I used to.Also i think you were the one who said that "scenarios are for noobs".

Reading through I can't see where you have said anything about the standard map. I was referring to custom maps which I said as 'an option' 3 times in this thread.

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 27.04.2016 at 09:15

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 09:04

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 27.04.2016 at 06:16

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 04:25

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 25.04.2016 at 09:34

More optional game mechanics and in-game strategy such as that proposed by Metallic Fear would be great for the game - these game elements could add to the games realism as well as providing a lot more objectivity.

man your post has like 2 upvotes yet you still keep supporting your BAD ideas.We like atwar as it is we dont want it to become RP.

As an optional extra for those that would like these kind of features for custom map's, it could be a good idea. Just because I support an idea, doesn't mean it will happen, I am also guessing isn't possible due to programming/timescales - I am showing encouragement to those that have expressed an idea to help the game, which would add more diversity to atWar. Sorry to see you don't like that. Furthermore you have played 3 custom map's in 300 days, why would you even have an opinion on this?

i didnt talk about custom maps i talked about standard map.And to catch up i havent played custom maps for a long time but I used to.Also i think you were the one who said that "scenarios are for noobs".

Reading through I can't see where you have said anything about the standard map. I was referring to custom maps which I said as 'an option' 3 times in this thread.

If it is an option for mapmakers i dont really mind even if i think that kind of maps will be retarted and cancer like RP.

Personally I find it pointless. You can add it if you're bored and have nothing to do (but you do have something to do, fix the fucking editor) but I doubt it would help much. Tags should get priority, though. Tags are more important than some people think, because sometimes factions that should be merged are divided due to units, like in Pyrrhus' WW2 Finland was meant to be part of Axis Minors but was seperated due to units.

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 27.04.2016 at 06:16

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 04:25

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 25.04.2016 at 09:34

More optional game mechanics and in-game strategy such as that proposed by Metallic Fear would be great for the game - these game elements could add to the games realism as well as providing a lot more objectivity.

man your post has like 2 upvotes yet you still keep supporting your BAD ideas.We like atwar as it is we dont want it to become RP.

As an optional extra for those that would like these kind of features for custom map's, it could be a good idea. Just because I support an idea, doesn't mean it will happen, I am also guessing isn't possible due to programming/timescales - I am showing encouragement to those that have expressed an idea to help the game, which would add more diversity to atWar. Sorry to see you don't like that. Furthermore you have played 3 custom map's in 300 days, why would you even have an opinion on this?

Ahahahaha hit the nail on the head

نوشتع شده توسط Zephyrusu, 27.04.2016 at 11:39

Personally I find it pointless. You can add it if you're bored and have nothing to do (but you do have something to do, fix the fucking editor) but I doubt it would help much. Tags should get priority, though. Tags are more important than some people think, because sometimes factions that should be merged are divided due to units, like in Pyrrhus' WW2 Finland was meant to be part of Axis Minors but was seperated due to units.

Tunder : just because is not a priority doesn't mean is a bad idea. Custom Resources are likely to happen in the future, its just a matter of when.

I dislike this suggestion. When i want more economic, i play europa universalis or hearts of iron!

نوشتع شده توسط Lemonade, 27.04.2016 at 15:45

I dislike this suggestion. When i want more economic, i play europa universalis or hearts of iron!

you could make the same argument for anything.

"I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play on a ww2 setting i would rather play hearts of iron!"
"I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play ww1 i would play hearts of iron!"
"I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play as napoleon i would play March of the eagles!"
"I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play in colonial era i would play europa Universalies!"
"i dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play roman maps i would play EU:Rome or Rome total war!"
"I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play space maps i would play warhammer40k or sterallis or masters of orion, or starruler 2.0"
'I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play on modern world i would play Wargames: European Escalation!"
"I dislike custom maps, if i wanted something more simple i would play risk!"
"I dislike x, if i wanted to do y i would play z"

you don't play custom maps anyways, so why do you care if admins added custom resources to custom maps? this idea won't affect the meta-game at all.

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 09:42

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 27.04.2016 at 09:15

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 09:04

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 27.04.2016 at 06:16

نوشتع شده توسط Nations, 27.04.2016 at 04:25

نوشتع شده توسط Sun Tsu, 25.04.2016 at 09:34

More optional game mechanics and in-game strategy such as that proposed by Metallic Fear would be great for the game - these game elements could add to the games realism as well as providing a lot more objectivity.

man your post has like 2 upvotes yet you still keep supporting your BAD ideas.We like atwar as it is we dont want it to become RP.

As an optional extra for those that would like these kind of features for custom map's, it could be a good idea. Just because I support an idea, doesn't mean it will happen, I am also guessing isn't possible due to programming/timescales - I am showing encouragement to those that have expressed an idea to help the game, which would add more diversity to atWar. Sorry to see you don't like that. Furthermore you have played 3 custom map's in 300 days, why would you even have an opinion on this?

i didnt talk about custom maps i talked about standard map.And to catch up i havent played custom maps for a long time but I used to.Also i think you were the one who said that "scenarios are for noobs".

Reading through I can't see where you have said anything about the standard map. I was referring to custom maps which I said as 'an option' 3 times in this thread.

If it is an option for mapmakers i dont really mind even if i think that kind of maps will be retarted and cancer like RP.

Then please read the threads before debating with your pearls of wisdom and try to keep forum feedback constructive.