مطلع حق بیمه برای مخفی کردن تمام تبلیغات
پست ها: 17   بازدید شده توسط: 66 users
05.02.2020 - 20:57
I think if you buff Blitz you need to buff RA, maybe adding +1 or + 2 of attack to all units. I guess that could motivate people to start playing RA or alteast a while to test it.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.02.2020 - 21:12
I have my plans. You'll find out soon
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.02.2020 - 21:21
RA does not need buffed. It's literally called "relentless attack"... who the fuck wouldn't want that strategy, it sounds menacing
----
Happiness = reality - expectations
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
05.02.2020 - 21:44
نوشتع شده توسط Tribune Aquila, 05.02.2020 at 21:21

RA does not need buffed. It's literally called "relentless attack"... who the fuck wouldn't want that strategy, it sounds menacing

bad to attack and bad to defend
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
06.02.2020 - 02:51
+1 defense and +1 attack to infantry with RA tanks would do the trick. It would completely negate PD tank bonuses.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
06.02.2020 - 10:46
I do not usually stand up for any startegies but Buffing the attack to end the walling?

Lirbur has joined the room
----
http://prntscr.com/omka79
http://prntscr.com/n1ymiv
Tacent quibbus Italia noverca est
Lirbur: therapy for england claims of superiority
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWyvoWzq3EM
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S8tP9wu2W0
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 00:50
نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 05.02.2020 at 21:12

I have my plans. You'll find out soon

Any updates on this?
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 01:06
نوشتع شده توسط Chess, 10.03.2020 at 00:50

نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 05.02.2020 at 21:12

I have my plans. You'll find out soon

Any updates on this?

I have my plans. You'll find out soon
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 09:43
نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 05.02.2020 at 21:44

نوشتع شده توسط Tribune Aquila, 05.02.2020 at 21:21

RA does not need buffed. It's literally called "relentless attack"... who the fuck wouldn't want that strategy, it sounds menacing

bad to attack and bad to defend


Not at all, buffed main attack units for only 90 is a big deal.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 12:28
I hope op ra isn't coming back. That's worse than op ds.

The op ra/blitz meta in 2015/16 was the worst meta I've seen.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 13:47
 4nic
نوشتع شده توسط Permamuted, 10.03.2020 at 12:28

I hope op ra isn't coming back. That's worse than op ds.

The op ra/blitz meta in 2015/16 was the worst meta I've seen.

+1 range to milita is the consensus agreement so far, its a very mild buff.
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon


بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 14:26
Tank general yall, tank general is coming. RA will be left in the dumpster
----


We are not the same- I am a Martian.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 14:55
نوشتع شده توسط 4nic, 10.03.2020 at 13:47

نوشتع شده توسط Permamuted, 10.03.2020 at 12:28

I hope op ra isn't coming back. That's worse than op ds.

The op ra/blitz meta in 2015/16 was the worst meta I've seen.

+1 range to milita is the consensus agreement so far, its a very mild buff.

If I have to buff RA, I would maybe make +1 attack to tank or maybe having even less price for tank, that yes I would start playing. RA turk but also, I heard on scenario RA is not a bad strat, idk about that since im not a scenario player, but + 1 range to militia is not a high buff I think. I changed a bit my mind of the thing I put up there.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 15:50
نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 10.03.2020 at 14:55

نوشتع شده توسط 4nic, 10.03.2020 at 13:47

نوشتع شده توسط Permamuted, 10.03.2020 at 12:28

I hope op ra isn't coming back. That's worse than op ds.

The op ra/blitz meta in 2015/16 was the worst meta I've seen.

+1 range to milita is the consensus agreement so far, its a very mild buff.

If I have to buff RA, I would maybe make +1 attack to tank or maybe having even less price for tank, that yes I would start playing. RA turk but also, I heard on scenario RA is not a bad strat, idk about that since im not a scenario player, but + 1 range to militia is not a high buff I think. I changed a bit my mind of the thing I put up there.

Nothing is set in stone for RA as of right now. We are still trying to make it not as busted as DS but not as weak as it is today. Especially in the later game stages.
----
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 16:15
نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 10.03.2020 at 14:55

If I have to buff RA, I would maybe make +1 attack to tank

A unit with attack 9 and range 8 for just 90? That's crazy. Also increasing its attack would boost the collateral damage that it does on cities.

نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 10.03.2020 at 14:55

or maybe having even less price for tank, that yes I would start playing.

Right now you are able to make a huge swarm of tanks, just imagine if the price gets lower...

نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 10.03.2020 at 14:55

RA turk but also, I heard on scenario RA is not a bad strat, idk about that since im not a scenario player

In my experience, RA is great for scenarios.

نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 10.03.2020 at 14:55

+ 1 range to militia is not a high buff I think. I changed a bit my mind of the thing I put up there.

As RA, the main defensive unit (Infantry) costs 90 and have -1 defence, it's weak and expensive. Militia doesn't have any nerfs, it is a solid 3/4 that costs 30, and with +1 range you may be able to move it around your cities and improve you defence capabilities without affecting your economy.
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
10.03.2020 - 16:17
نوشتع شده توسط Estus, 10.03.2020 at 16:15

نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 10.03.2020 at 14:55

If I have to buff RA, I would maybe make +1 attack to tank

A unit with attack 9 and range 8 for just 90? That's crazy. Also increasing its attack would boost the collateral damage that it does on cities.

نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 10.03.2020 at 14:55

or maybe having even less price for tank, that yes I would start playing.

Right now you are able to make a huge swarm of tanks, just imagine if the price gets lower...

نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 10.03.2020 at 14:55

RA turk but also, I heard on scenario RA is not a bad strat, idk about that since im not a scenario player

In my experience, RA is great for scenarios.

نوشتع شده توسط Palmitas, 10.03.2020 at 14:55

+ 1 range to militia is not a high buff I think. I changed a bit my mind of the thing I put up there.

As RA, the main defensive unit (Infantry) costs 90 and have -1 defence, it's weak and expensive. Militia doesn't have any nerfs, it is a solid 3/4 that costs 30, and with +1 range you may be able to move it around your cities and improve you defence capabilities without affecting your economy.

Mmmmm, true,
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
12.03.2020 - 10:00
نوشتع شده توسط Chess, 10.03.2020 at 00:50

نوشتع شده توسط Garde, 05.02.2020 at 21:12

I have my plans. You'll find out soon

Any updates on this?


New implementors doing their own RA update - Looked like a complete reimagining of the strat, and that turned me off quite a bit. Have fun with it though!
بارگیری...
بارگیری...
atWar

About Us
Contact

حریم خصوصی | شرایط و قوانین | بنرها | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

به ما بپیوندید در

گسترش این کلمه